🔗 Share this article

The Republic of South Africa's constitutional court has without dissent decided that both mothers and fathers of infants are entitled to equal parental leave - a groundbreaking decision hailed as a significant win for gender equality and household entitlements.

Current Legal Inequality

Based on the current law, female parents are allowed 120 days of leave, while male parents receive just 10 days.

Via its ruling, the supreme tribunal announced sections of the legislation invalid, labeling it discriminatory against fathers, and determined that mothers and fathers may now divide the granted leave according to their preferences.

"This is a ground-breaking advancement for fairness, household welfare, and the future of parenting in the nation," stated a representative, creator of a fathers' organization.

Court History

In 2023, a inferior tribunal determined specific provisions of the employment legislation and the insurance law unfair and ruled that they infringed upon the privileges of different household types.

The Gauteng High Court then determined that the law showed bias toward kinds of parents unequally regarding the period of parental leave and financial support received.

Court Hearing

The lawsuit was filed by a husband and wife, the rights body and other petitioners, who wanted to remedy the unfair societal burden predominantly impacting female parents, emphasizing that childcare duties should be shared.

The claimants contended that the existing law showed bias against parents who were different from the delivering parent - namely, male parents, adoptive parents, and caregivers of infants through surrogates - by providing them just two weeks of parental leave, while the birth mother got 120 days.

Court Explanation

Delivering the ruling on Friday, Judge Tshiqi declared that both parents should be entitled to distribute the available days as they considered suitable, describing the current law archaic and one which "unfairly burdened female parents and marginalized male parents".

"The safeguarding of biological mothers to the elimination of additional caregivers has the detrimental effect of sustaining the presumption that females are, and should be, the primary caregivers of infants.

"The male parent is excluded and deprived of the opportunity to involve himself as a caregiver in the rearing of the infant during the formative months of growth," she continued.

The justice said the judgment was not just about equal rights but also about safeguarding the honor of families, stressing that the ultimate focus of the legal determination was the welfare of children.

"The unequal treatment not merely excludes parents but also deprives children of the possibility to be with their guardians during a critical time of care and acclimatization to their changed circumstances."

Reactions and Implications

The claimants welcomed the ruling, while jurists advised that the decision would have far-reaching implications for businesses, who will have to modify their existing absence rules to follow the judgement.

"The core of the lawsuit is that it underscores the necessity to grant equal caregiver entitlements, acknowledging that nurturing a child is a joint duty," Tsietsi Shuping from the rights organization told the press.

He commented the current law "did not acknowledge developing community standards around child-rearing".

Labour lawyer Patrick Deale informed official outlets that the ruling was "a welcome and predicted conclusion" for caregiver entitlements in the nation.

Implementation Timeline

The tribunal has postponed its ruling of unconstitutionality for a specified period, giving the legislature time to modify the existing legislation to comply with its judgement.

During this period, parents will be granted choose how they want to divide the allocated time of leave.

In cases where a single guardian is working, that parent may use the full leave allocation.