🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are increasingly enabling the far right to dictate the public discourse, according to a new research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited radical parties by validating their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Study Based on Two Decades of News Coverage

The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six German publications.

Capital-based scholars noted that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core subjects like assimilation and migration, established political groups progressively adjusted their communication in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the dissemination of these concepts and indicated to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public discourse by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the far right," stated a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she noted.

The effect was evident even when mainstream parties were condemning the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is crucial."

Normalisation Effect Throughout Europe

While the study was focused on the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to nations across Europe.

"You see this a lot in European news outlets," explained another researcher. "Radical groups says something and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Discourse

At times, leaders have also hardened their discourse to match that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a then German chancellor advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar instances can be found across the continent, as elected officials from nations including the UK to France embrace the rhetoric of the radical right, particularly on immigration.

This has formed an feedback loop that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are talking about societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the far right, despite studies suggests that doing so drives voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Voter Awareness

The extent of data collected revealed that the impact of far-right parties had been gradual and had grown over time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," commented a researcher. "However, when you hear this negative framing around immigration every second week, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for example, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Established Parties to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The research emphasized the need for established political parties to develop their own discourses, especially on topics such as immigration and assimilation, rather than constantly trailing after the far right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "When the leader is radical and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing."